Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/6285/2026 of ABHEY KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 8 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6285/2026 & CM APPL. 30896/2026 ABHEY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana and Mr. Ahmad Kamaal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Choudhary, CGSC and

$~12

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) 6285/2026 & CM APPL. 30896/2026

ABHEY KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Zafar

Khurshid, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana and

Mr. Ahmad Kamaal, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Harsh Choudhary, CGSC and Mr.

Rajat

Mohan

Dwivedi,

GP

for

Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

08.05.2026 CM APPL. 30896/2026 (for exemption)

1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6285/2026

3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers: “i. Declare Rule 63(1)(ii) of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, as unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India, to the extent it permits recovery of amounts not incurred by the Government or authorises recovery resulting in unjust enrichment;

ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order, or direction, to declare the excess recovery initiated by the Respondents from the Petitioner illegal and unsustainable in law;

iii. Direct the Respondents to refund the excess amount of INR 31,29,052/- illegally recovered from the Petitioner;

iv. Direct the Respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% on the excess amount mentioned in prayer clause (ii), starting from the date of deposit, i.e., 19.03.2025; This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:36:25

v. Pass any other order(s) as may be deemed just, fit, and proper in the interest of justice.”

4. We note this petition is filed by a person who was the employee of the Central Government having worked as a Group A Officer.

5. The prayer as sought by the petitioner in this petition need be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal, [‘CAT’], therefore, we close this writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J MAY 08, 2026/msh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:36:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead