Delhi High Court

FAO (COMM)/103/2026 of ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS. Vs YY AND ORS on 13 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 103/2026 ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Shruti Baid, Ms. Aarshia Behl, Mr. Suryansh Gupta, Ms. Aashi Sharma and Ms. Bhavya Manda, Advs. (through VC). versus YY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Diya Kapur, Sr. Adv. with

$~40

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

FAO (COMM) 103/2026

ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS.

.....Appellants

Through:

Ms. Shruti Baid, Ms. Aarshia Behl,

Mr.

Suryansh

Gupta,

Ms.

Aashi

Sharma

and

Ms.

Bhavya

Manda,

Advs. (through VC).

versus

YY AND ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Diya Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Chaitanya D Mehta, Ms. Manjira

Dasgupta, Mr. Bhargav Ravindran

Thali,

Mr.

Mayank

Khaitan,

Mr.

Raghav Kumar and Mr. Naibedya

Dash, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 20.04.2026 CM APPL. 26025/2026

1. This application has been filed by the respondents/applicants with the following prayers:- “a. Direct the de-sealing/release of Respondent No 5’s systems, i.e., desktops and laptops seized and sealed by the local commissioners in pursuance of the

Order

dated 13.04.2026 in favour of Respondent No. 5 so as to permit Respondent No. 5 to use the same for its business operations and/or issue appropriate directions in respect of Order dated 13.04.2026 with such terms and conditions as may be deemed just and appropriate This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:39:00

by this Hon’ble Court;

b. Pass any further Order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to do complete justice in light of the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

2. The application was mentioned in the morning for being listed today. The same has been listed in pre-lunch session vide supplementary list. We have taken up the matter at 02:30 PM.

3. Ms. Shruti Baid, learned counsel who appears for the appellants/non- applicants, through video-conferencing, requests that the learned counsel for the respondents be directed to furnish a copy of the judgment(s) handed over to the Court, today. Same be given in soft version during the course of the day.

4. Having seen the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to direct the appearance of the Local Commissioners, who were appointed to execute the commission in terms of our order dated 13.04.2026, tomorrow in the Court.

5. Liberty is also granted to the counsel for the appellants to inform the Local Commissioners about their presence before the Court tomorrow.

6. Re-notify on 21.04.2026. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J APRIL 20, 2026/sr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:39:00

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead