Gujarat High Court
SCA/8175/2001 of PATEL VANDANABEN NARAYANBHAI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 13 December 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8175 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8175 of 2001
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PATEL VANDANABEN NARAYANBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Special Civil Application No. 8175 of 2001 MR PS PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 Ms. Shraddha Trivedi, AGP for Respondents No. 1-2 MR MANISH J PATEL for Respondent No. 3
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
Date of decision: 13/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties. Considered the submissions made by the learned advocates for the parties. The advertisement at Annexure "D" is for the recruitment to the post of Vidya Sahayak from a particular reserved category which has no bearing with the selection of the candidates who are in waiting list selected from the open general category. The respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner as and when Vidya Sahayak from the C.P. Ed. category is to be appointed from the open General Category.
Subject to the above observations, this petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Direct Service is Permitted.
13.12.2001. ���(H.K. Rathod,J.)
Vyas