Armed Forces Tribunal
Ex Swr Harphool Singh (Army) vs UOI & Others on 7 October 2025
**ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR**
**8.**
**MA(E) 104/2022 in OA 129/2019**
**Ex Swr Harphool Singh**
.... Applicant
**Versus**
.... Respondents
**UOI & Others**
For Applicant : Mr Yogendra Singh, Sunil Kumar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr Anil Bhardwaj, Advocate (R1-3)
Mr Yash Sharma, Advocate (R4&5)
**CORAM:**
**HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)**
**HON'BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)**

**O.R.D.E'R**
**07-10-2025**
सत्यमेव जयते
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. During the course of hearing Counsel for the Applicant submits that relief of Disability Pension in compliance of Order dated 31/5/2022 passed by this Tribunal has been extended to the Applicant, but the relief of FMA has not been granted to the Applicant till date. He further submits that FMA is part of the Disability Pension as the applicant has not opted to join the ECHS Scheme. Counsel for the Applicant, therefore, prays for directing the Respondents to grant FMA as entitled to the Applicant. Contra, counsel for the Respondents submits that relief as ordered by this Tribunal vide ibid Order has already been extended to the applicant and nothing remains on their part. Moreover, grant of FMA was not part of the Order passed by this Tribunal.
**यतो न्यायः ततो जयः**
2. Since the requisite action has already been taken by the Respondents, this Application has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.
3. As regards FMA, the applicant may, if so desired, make a Representation to the Competent Authority within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. The Respondents may examine the same within 
a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. The outcome thereof shall be intimated to the applicant.
4. With the above directions, the MA (E) is disposed off. File be consigned to record.

(SANJIV MITTAL) MEMBER (A)

सत्यमेव जयते

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (J)
cda/-
