Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/4336/2025 of ZAINUL ABIDEEN Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. on 31 December 2025

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 4336/2025, CRL.M.A. 39023/2025 & CRL.M.A. 39024/2025 ZAINUL ABIDEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Areeb Ahmad, Adv. alongwith petitioner in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl)

$~4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(CRL) 4336/2025,

CRL.M.A. 39023/2025 & CRL.M.A. 39024/2025

ZAINUL ABIDEEN

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Areeb Ahmad, Adv. alongwith

petitioner in person

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel

(Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Mr.

Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aryan

Sachdeva,

Advocates

SI

Arvind

Kumar, SI Rajeev SI Madhu, PS:

Mandir Marg alongwith Ms.

Leeza

Kaushik, Mr. Madhusudan (father of

Leeza), Ms. Sheely Kaushik (Sister of

Leeza)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

Page 1 of 2

O R D E R

%

31.12.2025

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus for the production of his wedded wife Mrs. Leeza Kaushik, who is stated to be in the custody of her parents.

2. Petitioner’s wife Mrs. Leeza Kaushik is present in Court alongwith her father Mr. Madhusudan Kaushik and sister Ms. Shelly Kaushik.

3. During the course of hearing, it is categorically stated by Mrs. Leeza Kaushik that she desires to reside with her husband/petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/01/2026 at 14:58:16

4. She further submits that the statement given earlier to the police officials to the effect that she does not wish to reside with her husband was under duress, on account of pressure exerted by her parents. She submits that she is willing to immediately start residing with the petitioner.

5. The aforesaid statement of Mrs. Leeza Kaushik is taken on record.

6. Mr. Madhusudan Kaushik and Ms. Shelly Kaushik (father and sister respectively of Mrs. Leeza Kaushik) undertake that they shall not interfere with the exercise by Mrs. Leeza Kaushik’s of her free will and volition, and her decision to reside with her husband. The said undertaking is taken on record.

7. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

8. The present petition stands disposed of. Pending applications are rendered infructuous.

9. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

SACHIN DATTA (VACATION JUDGE)

ANISH DAYAL (VACATION JUDGE) DECEMBER 31, 2025/rr/bp

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/01/2026 at 14:58:16

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead