Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/14315/2024 of VEENA RANI JOSHI Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 20 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14315/2024 VEENA RANI JOSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogendra Kumar Verma, Mr. Jayesh Kain, Mr. Manish Narang, Mr. Anmol Pandey, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prajesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya,
$~36
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) 14315/2024
VEENA RANI JOSHI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Verma,
Mr. Jayesh Kain, Mr. Manish
Narang, Mr. Anmol Pandey,
Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Prajesh Vikram Srivastava,
SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya,
Govt.
Pleader
and
Mr.
Bhuvnesh Vikram, Adv.
Mr.
S.
Rajappa
Mr.
R.
Gowrishankar
and
Ms.
G.
Dhivyasri for KVS.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
15
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 20.11.2025
1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 4656/2018, titled Mrs. Veena Rani Joshi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., whereby the said O.A. filed by the petitioners herein, seeking, inter alia, the grant of pensions under the GPF-cum- Pension Scheme was, rejected.
2. The issue raised by the petitioners now stands covered by our Judgment dated 02.09.2025, titled Bharti Bahuguna v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., 2025:DHC:7629-DB. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/11/2025 at 15:44:29
3. The learned counsels for the respondents have, however, raised an objection with respect to the delay in filing the present petitions.
4. We find merit in the said submission of the learned counsels for the respondents, however, at the same time, as the matter involves a claim of pension, we balance the equities by directing that, for the intervening period, that is, from the date of the Order passed by the learned Tribunal till the filing of the present Writ Petition, the petitioners would not be entitled to claim interest on any amount found payable to them pursuant to the relief granted by us in the aforesaid Judgment.
5. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the above terms. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J NOVEMBER 20, 2025/prg/P/Yg This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/11/2025 at 15:44:29