Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/13/2026 of Rigam Taniang Vs Smti Marchina Boria on 14 October 2026
GAHC040005562026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/13/2026 Rigam Taniang Son of Late Rigam Tasar, permanent resident of Village Tali, PO and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Smti
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005562026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/13/2026
Rigam Taniang
Son of Late Rigam Tasar, permanent resident of Village Tali, PO and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Smti Marchina Boria
Wife of Shri Tagru Punung, presently posted at Tali as Additional Deputy Commissioner in the office of ADC, Tali, PO and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Sange Drema Philley,Biri Esther,Maji Dui,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,K Gara,Bomyom Ori,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : Gallen Taloh, Maga Tanga,Gyamar Tala,Vishal Tatgum Gurung BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
Date : 15.10.2026
Heard Mr. M. Lego, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Taloh, learned counsel for the sole respondent. The learned counsel for the sole respondent submits that the order of the Court dated 17.03.2026, passed in WP(C)/100/2026 has been complied with by Page No.# 2/2 the respondent by passing a Speaking Order dated 14.10.2026. Referring to the speaking order enclosed as Annexure-2 to the additional affidavit, the learned counsel submits that upon considering the representation, the respondent has rejected the representation on the grounds stated therein. Upon perusal of the same, it appears that Court’s direction has been complied with and accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…