Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/94/2026 of Ananta Neog and Anr Vs The State of AP and 2 Ors on 12 October 2026
GAHC040017362026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/94/2026 Ananta Neog and Anr Son of Shri Phuleswar Neog, resident of Village Sitpani Moran, PO and PS Mahadevpur, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:
GAHC040017362026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/94/2026
Ananta Neog and Anr
Son of Shri Phuleswar Neog, resident of Village Sitpani Moran, PO and PS
Mahadevpur, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Diganta Neog Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Phuleswar Neog
resident of Village Sitpani Moran
PO and PS Mahadevpur
Namsai District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 2 Ors
represented by the PP of AP 2:Ratan Chetia Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Shri Photic Chetia
Village Sitpani Moran
PO and PS Mahadevpur
Namsai District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Bimal Neog
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Shri Mileswar Neog
PO and PS Mahadevpur
Namsai District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : C W Mantaw,
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.10.2026
Heard Mr. C. W. Mantaw, learned counsel for the applicants, who submits that by filing this application, the applicants pray for suspension of the judgment and order dated 20.07.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tezu, in Criminal Appeal No. 01(NMS)/2026, whereby the judgment and order dated 23.12.2025, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Namsai, in GR Case No. 99/2019, was upheld. The applicants also pray for suspension of the impugned judgment and order dated 23.12.2025, passed by the learned Trial Court. The learned counsel submits that after the judgment and order was passed by the learned Trial Court, the applicants were allowed to remain on bail for a period of six (6) months from the date of the judgment.
2. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. This Court, vide order dated 13.10.2026, passed in the main criminal revision petition has considered the contentions of the petitioners and therefore, having regard to the same, this Court is of the considered view that pending finalization of the main criminal revision petition, the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court, as well as the order passed by the learned Appellate Court, shall remain suspended.
4. Accordingly, both the sentences passed by the learned Courts below shall remain suspended pending finalization of the main criminal revision petition. The applicants shall be allowed to remain on bail, in terms of the bail bonds that have been executed before the learned Trial Court till disposal of the instant criminal revision petition.
5. The I.A. (Crl.) stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant