Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/232/2026 of Trashi Tchondrui Dirkhipa Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 8 October 2026
GAHC040017112026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/232/2026 Trashi Tchondrui Dirkhipa Son of Late Trashi Dirkhipa, PO and PS Dirang, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040017112026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/232/2026
Trashi Tchondrui Dirkhipa
Son of Late Trashi Dirkhipa, PO and PS Dirang, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Commissioner (Power), Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner Finance
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:Thee Chief Engineer (Power)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Western Electrical Zone
Department of Power
Vidyut Bhawan
Itanagar.
4:The Director of Audit and Pension
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Mini Secretariat
Naharlagun
Advocate for the Petitioner : Jumli Ninu, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Lissing Perme,SC(Power)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 09.10.2026
Heard Mr. J. Ninu, learned counsel for the applicant in I.A(C)/232/2026, who submits that by filing this application the applicant seeks correction of the name of the petitioner in the cause title of the writ petition since there has been a clerical error in the spelling of the name of the petitioner. He submits that name of the petitioner should be “Trashi Tchondrui Dirkhipa” instead of “Tashi Tchondrui Dirkhipa”. The learned counsel submits that the mistake committed being a clerical mistake, the applicant may be allowed to correct the same. Mr. T. Tagam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. L. Perme, learned Standing Counsel, Power, who represents respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and Mr. N. Lowang, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 4 have no objections to the prayer. In view of above, the application for rectification of the name of the petitioner in the main writ petition as prayed for in this application is hereby allowed. I.A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant