Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/225/2026 of Pesi Jilen Vs Nyamar Karbak on 29 September 2026
GAHC040016622026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/225/2026 Pesi Jilen Son of Late Gope Jilen, resident of Village Ese Karte, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Nyamar Karbak Son
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040016622026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/225/2026
Pesi Jilen
Son of Late Gope Jilen, resident of Village Ese Karte, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Nyamar Karbak
Son of Late Tumya Karbak, resident of Village Dego Kamki, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Reniyam Takam, Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER
Date : 30.09.2026
Heard Mr. D. Lona, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent. Also heard Mr. J. Karbak, learned counsel for the opposite party/election petitioner.
By filing this interlocutory application under Order XVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the applicant seeks adjournment of Page No.# 2/2 the Election Petition No.06(AP)/2024 on the ground that the conducting counsel is out of station and, therefore, could not appear before the Court today.
Prayer so made by the learned counsel for the applicant/respondent is not objected to by the learned counsel for the opposite party.
In view of the ground stated in the application and the submission made, the prayer for adjournment is allowed.
In view of the above, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.10.01 11:36:58 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…