Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/92/2026 of Winthan Mossang and 2 Ors Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 27 September 2026
GAHC040016332026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/92/2026 Winthan Mossang and 2 Ors Son of Late Somkhum Mossang, resident of Khagam Mossang Village, PO and PS Miao, Changlang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:
GAHC040016332026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/92/2026
Winthan Mossang and 2 Ors
Son of Late Somkhum Mossang, resident of Khagam Mossang Village, PO and PS
Miao, Changlang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Thankam Mossang
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Somkhum Mossang
resident of Khagam Mossang Village
PO and PS Miao
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3: Ongong Mossang
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Somkhum Mossang
resident of Khagam Mossang Village
PO and PS Miao
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Home Department, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2:Sinengam Singpho Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Senentang Singpho
resident of Village Lewang
PO and PS Miao
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Moko Jowlon Singpho
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Moko Nong Sinpho
resident of Village Lewang
PO and PS Miao
District Changlang
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Indengam Singpho
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Inden Nong Sinpho
resident of Village Phup
District Changlang
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Indenlah Singpho
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Inden Nong Sinpho
resident of Village Phup
PO and PS Miao
District Changlang
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:Miyangtang Singpho
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Miyangla Sinpho
resident of Village Khagam Singpho
PO and PS Miao
District Changlang
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Niranjan Sarma, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Khogen Bui BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.09.2026
Heard Ms P. Pradhan, learned counsel for the applicants.
The applicants filed this interlocutory application seeking amendment of the connected criminal petition No.40(AP)/2026 by marking annexures which was inadvertently left unmarked.
Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. D. Nair, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 6 has no objection to the prayer made by the applicants.
Upon consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the fact that the respondent has no objection for amendment of the petition, the prayer for amendment in criminal petition No. 40(Ap)/2026 is allowed.
Accordingly, the applicant/petitioner is permitted to marked the annexures in the paragraphs 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the connected criminal petition.
The applicant is accordingly, permitted to file amended petition.
With the above, the instant interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.28 18:16:25 +05'30'