Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/593/2025 of Niranjan Kumar Jha Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 20 September 2026
GAHC040020692025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/593/2025 Niranjan Kumar Jha Son of Shri Siyanand Jha, presently working as Executive Engineer (E) (under suspension), Daporijo Electrical Division, Department
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040020692025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/593/2025
Niranjan Kumar Jha
Son of Shri Siyanand Jha, presently working as Executive Engineer (E) (under suspension), Daporijo Electrical Division, Department of Power, Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, PO Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111
2:The Secretary
Age: 0
Occupation :
Department of Power
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Chief Engineer (Power)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Central Electrical Zone
Department of Power
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:The Superintendent of Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Electrical at Ziro
Electrical Circle
APEC-5
Ziro
Page No.# 2/2
PO and PS Ziro
Department of Power
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Biswajit Prasad, 1 S Shah Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC(Power),Lissing Perme BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21-09-2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. L. Perme, learned Standing Counsel for the Power Department, submits that the departmental proceedings have already been culminated into a penalty of minor punishment. By now, the petitioner has been promoted to the next higher post(s). In view of the above, writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly, the same stands closed as infructuous. Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned State counsel is present. JUDGE CHECKED & VERIFIED Digitally signed by Jumbi Bam Date: 2026.09.21 15:41:20 +05'30'