Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/459/2025 of M/s Barapani Enterprises Vs The Union of India and 3 Ors on 20 September 2026
GAHC040016252025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/459/2025 M/s Barapani Enterprises represented by its power of attorney holder Shri Tago Taju, Son of Late Chilli Taju, Village Lika, Likabali, Lower Siang
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040016252025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/459/2025
M/s Barapani Enterprises
represented by its power of attorney holder Shri Tago Taju, Son of Late Chilli Taju, Village Lika, Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 791125
VERSUS
The Union of India and 3 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt of India, Transport Bhawan, 1 Parliament Street, New Delhi, 110001
2:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its General Manager (P) Branch Office PMU BASAR
PO and PS Basar
Leparada District
Arunachal Pradesh 791101
3:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its General Manager (P) Branch Office PME Likabali PO and PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 791125
4:The Executive Director (P)
Age: 0
Occupation :
National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd Regional Office Division IV
Page No.# 2/2
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh. 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : Arup Bhatttacharjee, Doli Mara,G T Sangma,A R Gogoi Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, Tapan Bharali,Surendra Sahu,CGSC,KeekeLoya,DSGI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21-09-2026 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum/Court, as the respondents have disputed the claim of the petitioner. Mr. K. Loya, learned CGC, and Ms. A. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, NHIDCL, are present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum/Court, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant