Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/450/2026 of Lemkai Rangkham Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 17 September 2026
GAHC040015692026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/450/2026 Lemkai Rangkham Son of Shri Pankam Rangkham, Chanu Village, PO and PS Longding, District Longding, Arunachal Pradesh 792131 VERSUS The State of AP and
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015692026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/450/2026
Lemkai Rangkham
Son of Shri Pankam Rangkham, Chanu Village, PO and PS Longding, District Longding, Arunachal Pradesh 792131
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Department of Water Resources Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The Chief Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
WRD
Eastern Zone
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh 791111
3:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
WRD
Namsai
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
PO and PS Namsai
Namsai District
Arunachal Pradesh 792103
4:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Page No.# 2/2
Occupation :
WRD
Kanubari
PO and PS Kanubari
Longding District
Arunachal Pradesh 79213
Advocate for the Petitioner : Jyoti Zongluju, Charu Bosco,Yanum Singhi,Phunai Wangpan Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18-09-2026 Mr. P. Wangpan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, as there occurred a technical defect in the petition. Ms. R. Basar, learned State counsel, is present. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant