Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/497/2023 of Nabam Kame and Anr. Vs The State of AP and 3 Others on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040013962023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/497/2023 Nabam Kame and Anr. S/o Tarh Tana, resident of village Rigio, PO. Mengio, PS. Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mob No. 9856102752

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040013962023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/497/2023

Nabam Kame and Anr.

S/o Tarh Tana, resident of village Rigio, PO. Mengio, PS. Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mob No. 9856102752

VERSUS

The State of AP and 3 Others

represented by Commissioner(Home) to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.

2:The Director General of Police

Age: 0

Occupation :

Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

3:The Executive Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

West Division

APH and WCL

(Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Undertaking) Police Headquarter Itanagar.

4:M/s Jerkin Enterprise

Age: 0

Occupation :

represented by Shri Chukhu Takam

R/o Silsango

PO/PS Sagalee

District Papum Pare

A

Advocate for the Petitioner : Neelam Taje, L Tatam Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 18.09.2026

None appears for the petitioners on call. However, Mr. Y. Riram, learned State counsel is present.

The matter pertains to fresh notice inviting tender dated 08.07.2023 for construction of Government Quarters at Yupia, Sagalee and Mengio.

Since, the NIT was of the year 2023 for constructions of the Government Quarters, it appears that the same might have been completed therefore, the petitioner appears to be no longer interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.18 16:50:03 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead