Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/32/2025 of M/s Eka Enterprise Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 15 September 2026
GAHC040001072025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/32/2025 M/s Eka Enterprise represented by its proprietor Shri Nabam Eka, Son of Late Nabam Kojum, resident of B Sector, Naharlagun, Papum Pare District,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040001072025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/32/2025
M/s Eka Enterprise
represented by its proprietor Shri Nabam Eka, Son of Late Nabam Kojum, resident of B Sector, Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Commissioner, RWD, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Work Department
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Work Circle
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Work Division
Pakke Kessang
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Dilip Saikia, Taku Pumbo,T Nima,Tana Rini,T Poha Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC (RWD)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16-09-2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. The matter pertains to a claim for payment of an outstanding bill amounting to Rs. 92,44,347/- on account of execution of work for “Construction of Road from MRL-13 road to Lanka Village, Package No. AR20/AR03/04/051”. It is submitted by Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD Department, that there are no outstanding bills pending against the petitioner and that whatever claim was raised by the petitioner has been duly paid. In view of the above, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE CHECKED & VERIFIED Digitally signed by Jumbi Bam Date: 2026.09.16 15:14:08 +05'30'