Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/581/2025 of M/s Hills Trading Company Vs The Union of India and 5 Ors on 15 September 2026
GAHC040020362025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/581/2025 M/s Hills Trading Company represented by its proprietor Smti Yatung Byaling, Wife of Shri Tanga Byaling, permanent resident of Byaling Building,
GAHC040020362025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/581/2025
M/s Hills Trading Company
represented by its proprietor Smti Yatung Byaling, Wife of Shri Tanga Byaling, permanent resident of Byaling Building, Golden Market Daporijo, PO and PS
Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Kim Paka Colony Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The Union of India and 5 Ors
represented by the Inspector General, North East Frontier HQ, ITB Police MHA, Govt of India, Khatting Hill Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
7911112:The Deputy Inspector General
Age: 0
Occupation :
SHQ Likabali
ITBP Force
MHA/ Govt of India
Upper Colony Likabali
Lower Siang District 791125
3:The Second in Commandant (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Likabali ITBP
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Deputy Commandant (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
NE FTR ITB Police
Itanagar.
5:The Commandant
Age: 0
Occupation :
10th Bn ITBP Kimin
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The Assistant Commandant (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
10th Bn ITB Police
Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Wanglat Khomrang,Tadar Bai,E S NIDO MARI,Biri Esther,Nannu Yubi,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16.09.2026
Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the work pursuant to the impugned NIT dated 15.11.2025 for construction of OR’s accommodation (02 Nos of Jawan Barak) at Maja BOP of 10th Battalion, Kimin (Balance work) has already been completed, however, he prays that he may be allowed to avail the appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
Mr. M. Kato, learned Dy.SGI for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous Needless to observe that the petitioner may avail the appropriate remedies for payment of dues, if any, payable to the petitioner as may be permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.16 15:13:46 +05'30'