Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023 of Yumpe Taipodia Vs Marto Riba on 15 September 2026
GAHC040005342023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023 Yumpe Taipodia Age: 50 Occupation : Address:S/o Doyum Taipodia Resident of Village Liru PO/PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005342023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023
Yumpe Taipodia
Age: 50
Occupation :
Address:S/o Doyum Taipodia
Resident of Village Liru
PO/PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Marto Riba
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:The Deputy Commissioner
Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : T T Tara
Sr. Adv
Advocate for : I Riram appearing for Marto Riba: Advocate appearing for respectively.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2 Date : 16.09.2026
Heard Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner.
The alleged contemnor has filed the affidavit by annexing the order dated 04.12.2023. It reflects that the petitioner was heard as per the direction of this Court dated 25.01.2023 wherein, the petitioner appears to have admitted that all the plots of land where the LPCs have been issued are not disturbed from any side, accordingly, it has been decided by the alleged contemnor that the plots of land where the LPC have been issued to the petitioner and his relatives will be entered and showed in the index list of map of the final notice as and when the entire matter regarding headquarter issues will be resolved.
Although Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously submitted that the alleged contemnor has violated the order of this Court before hearing the petitioner, this Court is of unhesitant view that the order of this Court dated 25.01.2023 has duly been complied with.
Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant +05'30'