Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/203/2026 of Tindu Chader Vs The State of AP and 2 Ors on 6 September 2026
GAHC040014542026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/203/2026 Tindu Chader Son of Late Tayu Chader, resident of Village Gumsing Tayong, PO Taksing, PS Nacho Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The
GAHC040014542026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/203/2026
Tindu Chader
Son of Late Tayu Chader, resident of Village Gumsing Tayong, PO Taksing, PS
Nacho Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 2 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Land Management Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Daporijo
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Circle Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Taksing
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Pondit Ronya, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07.09.2026
Heard Shri T. T. Tara, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri G. Bam, learned counsel for the applicant.
The instant application has been filed seeking suspension of the Corrigendum Order dated 10.08.2026, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Upper Subansiri District.
It is the case of the petitioner that in the connected WP(C) No.260(AP)/2026, this Court vide an order dated 16.06.2026 had directed maintenance of status quo. The said interim order was extended on 03.07.2026. However, vide the Corrigendum order dated 10.08.2026, the Deputy Commissioner had come to a finding on facts and held that the claim of the petitioner is absolutely vague and is not valid.
While the Deputy Commissioner may be correct on facts, when an order of status quo has been passed by this Court and is subsisting, such findings could not have been arrived at and transmitted in the form of corrigendum.
In that view of the matter, until further orders, the Corrigendum dated 10.08.2026 is suspended.
Interlocutory application stands disposed of.
Shri Tara, learned Senior Counsel has also informed this Court that in the meantime, a contempt case being Cont.Cas(C) No.29/2026 has been filed wherein notice has been issued.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.07 16:54:09 +05'30'