Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/351/2025 of Debashish Deb Vs The State of AP and 2 Ors on 1 September 2026
GAHC040012942025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/351/2025 Debashish Deb presently serving as Block Development Officer under the Directorate of Rural Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, Papum
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040012942025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/351/2025
Debashish Deb
presently serving as Block Development Officer under the Directorate of Rural Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 2 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Rural Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Director of Rural Development Department Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Departmental Transfer and posting Committee Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its Chairperson
Rural Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Sr. Adv, Mindo Taso,Idak Bam,Ligam Nochi Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha, SC (RD)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02.09.2026 Heard Shri M. Taso, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel for the Rural Development Department. Both the learned counsel have submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition, accordingly, stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant