Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/540/2024 of Yamra Tatup Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 1 September 2026
GAHC040015862024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/540/2024 Yamra Tatup Son of Late Yamra Sakap, resident of Village Taba, PO Damin, PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 VERSUS The
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040015862024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/540/2024
Yamra Tatup
Son of Late Yamra Sakap, resident of Village Taba, PO Damin, PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111
2:The Director of Rural Development
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Koloriang
Kurung Kumey District
Arunachal Pradesh 791118
4:The Project Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Development
Kurung Kumey District
Koloriang
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Chera Tapung
Age: 0
Occupation :
PTA cum EO(RE)
Page No.# 2/2
C/o BDO
Paniasang CD Block
PO and PS Koloriang
Kurung Kumey District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, K Gara,Nannu Yubi,M Lego,Wanglat Khomrang,Tame Rimi,Tadar Bai,Chorpok Modi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (RD),Binter Picha BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026 Heard Shri C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. T. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, AP and Shri B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel, RD. The petition was instituted challenging an order dated 22.08.2024 whereby the petitioner, who was serving as Panchayat Technical Assistant to look after the charge of EO (RE) of Paniasang CD Block till the joining of regular EO or until further orders. The learned counsel for the petitioner has however submitted that he has instruction not to press this writ petition. Ms. T. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, AP and Shri B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel, RD do not raise any objection. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant