Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/128/2026 of The Arunachal University of Studies Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 26 August 2026
GAHC040008692026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/128/2026 The Arunachal University of Studies through its Registrar Mr Divyanshu Goel, NH 52, Knowledge City, Namsai, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh 79210
GAHC040008692026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/128/2026
The Arunachal University of Studies
through its Registrar Mr Divyanshu Goel, NH 52, Knowledge City, Namsai, Namsai District, Arunachal Pradesh 79210
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Secretary Education, Department of Education, Ministry of Education, Itanagar, Civil Secretariat, Block IV, 5th Floor, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111
2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by the Secretary Legal Affairs Department of Legal Affairs Ministry of Law and justice Itanagar Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111
3:The Arunachal Pradesh Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by Secretary
Arunachal Pradesh Private Educational Institution Regulatory Commission APSCTE Building Directorate of Higher Education Campus ESS Sector Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111
4:Tsering Naksang
Age: 0
Occupation :
presently working as Chairman of the Arunachal Pradesh Private Institution Regulatory Commission APSCTE Building Director of Higher Education Campus ESS Sector Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Directorate of technical and Higher Education),Tagum Jamoh BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.08.2026 (Kardak Ete, J.) Heard Mr. A. D. Barman, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Koyu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Tagum, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department; Ms. K. Wangmu, learned State Counsel for the State respondent No. 2; and Mr. K. Tabang, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. None appears for the respondent No. 4 despite service of notice. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 6 days in filing the connected writ appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.05.2026, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 531/2025.
Upon perusal of the grounds stated in the application and the explanation furnished by the applicant, we are satisfied that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for not filing the connected appeal within the prescribed period of limitation.The learned counsels appearing for the respondents have also not opposed the condonation of delay of 6 days. Accordingly, the delay of 6 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned. The I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant