Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/179/2026 of Tai Nikio Vs Tadar Mangku on 26 August 2026
GAHC040008752024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/179/2026 Tai Nikio Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of late Tai Kami permanent resident of Village Peel PO and PS Sangram Kurung Kumey District Arunachal
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008752024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/179/2026
Tai Nikio
Age: 55
Occupation :
Address:Son of late Tai Kami
permanent resident of Village Peel
PO and PS Sangram
Kurung Kumey District
Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa Doimukh Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791123
VERSUS
Tadar Mangku
Age: 55
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Tadar Tagam
permanent resident of Village Langth Loth PO and PS Nyapin Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791110
------------
Advocate for applicant : Rinchin Ledo Thungon Advocate for responden : K Posi appearing for Tadar Mangku: Advocate appearing for respectively.
Linked Case :Election Pet./7/2024
Page No.# 2/2
Tadar Mangku
Son of Late Tadar Tagam, permanent resident of Village Langht Loth, PO and PS
Nyapin, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791110
VERSUS
Tai Nikio
Son of Late Tai Kami, permanent resident of Village Peel, PO and PS Sangram, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa, Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791123
Advocate for the Petitioner : D J Kapil, D Tadar,K Posi Advocate for the Respondent : Pritam Taffo, Sr. Adv, Tabing Lamgu,1 P K Tiwari, Sr.
Advocate,Rinchin Ledo Thungon
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27.08.2026 Heard Mr. P. K. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Biswas, learned counsel, along with Mr. D. J. Kapil, learned counsel for the opposite party/election petitioner. Mr. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel, submits that he is not pressing the present interlocutory application. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands closed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant