Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/265/2025 of Mojee Karlo Vs Doi Riram on 25 August 2026
GAHC040018122025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/265/2025 Mojee Karlo Son of Shri Marmo Karlo, resident of Jipu Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Doi Riram Son of
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040018122025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/265/2025
Mojee Karlo
Son of Shri Marmo Karlo, resident of Jipu Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Doi Riram
Son of Late Jumdo Riram, permanent resident of Jipu Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Karge Angu,Pate Mesi Lomdak,Tonni Gammi,Tukrin Ligu,Goyi Taba Raju,Tanur Gao,Amy Talom Advocate for the Respondent : Tagum Jamoh, Linked Case : WP(C)/454/2025
Doi Riram
Age: 37
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Jumdo Riram
permanent resident of Jipu Village
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and Anr
Age: 0
Occupation :
Page No.# 2/2
Address:represented by the Principal Secretary Environment and Forest/ Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Department of Environment Forest and Climate Change Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
2:The Divisional Forest Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Likabali Forest Division
Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : Tagum Jamoh
Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and Anr: Advocate , appearing for 2, respectively.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26-08-2026
Mr. T. Gao, learned counsel for the applicant, prays for withdrawal of this interlocutory application. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Mr. K. Tabang, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner, and Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, are present. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands closed as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant