Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/406/2026 of Bullet Megu Vs The State of AP and 4 Ors on 24 August 2026
GAHC040013922026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/406/2026 Bullet Megu Son of Late Abung Megu, a permanent resident of Sille Oyan Sikabamin, PO and PS Oyan, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040013922026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/406/2026
Bullet Megu
Son of Late Abung Megu, a permanent resident of Sille Oyan Sikabamin, PO and PS
Oyan, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently posted as Range Forest Officer, Bordumsa Range, Office of the DFO Nampong FD, Jairampur, Changlang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 4 Ors
represented through the Principal Secretary, Department of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Principal Chief
Conservator of Forest and HOFF
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Chief Conservator of Forest
Age: 0
Occupation :
Southern Arunachal Circle
Deomali
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Divisional Forest Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Nampong Forest Division
Jairampur
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/2
5:Taameng Panor
Age: 0
Occupation :
Range Forest Officer
Nampong Forest Division Jairampur
Changlang District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D Ado Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.08.2026
Mr. K. Lollen, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Ms. P. Pangu, learned State Counsel for the State respondents, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant