Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/622/2024 of M/s G B Enterprises Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 24 August 2026
GAHC040018742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/622/2024 M/s G B Enterprises represented by its proprietor Shri Loma Golo, resident of Devegolo village, PO Pijerang, PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal
GAHC040018742024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/622/2024
M/s G B Enterprises
represented by its proprietor Shri Loma Golo, resident of Devegolo village, PO
Pijerang, PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors
represented by the Secretary, RWD cum Chief Executive Officer, ARRDA, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0
Occupation :
PMGSY
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Superintendent Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Work Circle (RWC) Rupa
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Chairman
Age: 0
Occupation :
Tender Evaluation Committee
RWC
Rupa
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The Executive Engineer / PIU
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rural Works Department
Bameng Division
East Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:M/s Tamchi Kusuk
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Shri Tamchi Kusuk Son of Late Tamchi Togung resident of Chandra Nagar Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
7:M/s PSK Enterprises
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Shri Abo Wangpan Village Dasatong PO and PS Kanubari Longding District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Pritam Taffo, Sr. Adv, Tana Rini,Preety Moyong,Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, Dicky Panging, Sr. Adv,Marge Doji,Daina Tamuk,SC
(RWD)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.08.2026
Mr. E. Menjo, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel, RWD, have fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as having been become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant