Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/79/2026 of Ronnie Bori Vs Thomas Lego on 23 August 2026
GAHC040003792026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/79/2026 Ronnie Bori Son of Late Robin Bori, resident of Oyan Village, PO and SP Sille Oyan, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Thomas Lego
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040003792026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/79/2026
Ronnie Bori Son of Late Robin Bori, resident of Oyan Village, PO and SP Sille Oyan, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Thomas Lego proprietor of M/s T Lego Filling Station, resident of Oyan Village, PO
and SP Sille Oyan, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kamal Saxena, Moni Bori,Denzing Sonuwal Advocate for the Respondent : Gotu Riba, Licha Teni,Minjum Kamcham,O Tayeng Linked Case : RSA/2/2026
Ronnie Bori
Age: 47 Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Robin Bori
resident of Oyan Village PO and PS Sille Oyan East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Thomas Lego
Age: 0Occupation :
Address:proprietor of M/s T Lego Filling Station resident of Oyan Village PO and SP Sille Oyan East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : Denzing Sonuwal
Advocate for : appearing for Thomas Lego: Advocate appearing for respectively.
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.08.2026
Heard Mr. Denzing Sonowal, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant. Also heard Mr. Gotu Riba, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/sole respondent.
2. In view of the order passed by this Court today in the connected appeal being RSA 02(AP)2026, no further order is called for in this interlocutory application and the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant