Gauhati High Court

IA(C)/193/2026 of Nyamar Karbak Vs Pesi Jilen on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040013682026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/193/2026 Nyamar Karbak Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Pesi Jilen Son of

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040013682026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(C)/193/2026

Nyamar Karbak Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki, PO and PS

Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

Pesi Jilen Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

Advocate for the Petitioner : Jumge Karbak, Advocate for the Respondent : Doge Lona, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 19.08.2026

Heard Mr. Jumge Karbak, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicant/election petitioner.

2. By filing the instant interlocutory application under Order XVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicant/election petitioner is seeking adjournment of the hearing of the connected election petition being E.P. 06(AP)2024 along with the related interlocutory applications being IA(c)155(AP)2025, IA(c)105(AP)2026, IA(c)145(AP)2026, and IA(c)150(AP)2026,on the ground that the conducting counsel Mr. Marto Kato is presently out-of-station.

Page No.# 2/2

3. Mr. Doge Lona, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party/ returned candidate, raised no objection to the above prayer for adjournment of the hearing of the connected election petition and interlocutory applications.

4. Considering the grounds stated in this application and upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties; the prayer for adjournment of the hearing of the connected election petition being E.P. 06(AP)2024 along with the related interlocutory applications being IA(c)155(AP)2025, IA(c)105(AP)2026, IA(c)145(AP)2026, and IA(c)150(AP)2026, is allowed.

5. The instant interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead