Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/243/2023 of Chukhu Bablu and Anr. Vs THE STATE OF AP and 14 Ors. on 16 August 2026
GAHC040006602023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/243/2023 Chukhu Bablu and Anr. ZPM XVI Gumto Zilla Parishad Constituency, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, Son of Chukhu Loma, Resident of Village Gumto
GAHC040006602023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/243/2023
Chukhu Bablu and Anr.
ZPM XVI Gumto Zilla Parishad Constituency, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, Son of Chukhu Loma, Resident of Village Gumto I, PO Doimukh, PS
Doimukh, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh, Mobile No. 9436844444.
2: Techi Necha
Age:
Occupation :
Member
Disciplinary Action Committee
Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP)
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh
Son of Late Techi Kaha
PO RK Mission
PS Chimpu
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
Mobile No. 943605986
VERSUS
THE STATE OF AP and 14 Ors.
Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Yupia
District Papum Pare
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The ADC cum Member Secretary
Age: 0
Occupation :
Zilla Parisad
Yupia
DIstrict Papum Pare
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Nabam Yakum
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM XIV Parang Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Nabam Tadap Resident of Village Parang III
Sagalee
Papum Pare DIstrict
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Bamang Yayu
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM III Kimin Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Shri Bamang Mangha Resident of Villlage Kimin Model Village KImin Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
6:Hina Camdir Tok
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM IV Upper Balijan Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Topu Tok Resident of Basarnalo Village PO/PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
7:Tem Pika
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM V Lower Balijan Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and wife of Tem Kaya Resident of Kochubari Village PO/PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
8:Tem Yaba
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM VI Taraso Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District wife of Shri Tem Tatik Resident of Village Kochubari Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
9:Nabam Yajar
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM VIII Mengio Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District Wife of Nabam Hari Resident of Village Tacha Mengio Sagalee Ciecle Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
10:Nabam Tagi
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM IX Leporiang Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and son of Nabam Soha Presently residing at B Sector Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
11:Techi Niya
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM XV Silsango Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District and Resident of Nyopang 1
Silsango Circle
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
12:Tai Sangte
Age: 0
Occupation :
ZPM XVI Kakoi Zilla Parishad Constituency Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
13:Taba Rama
Age: 0
Occupation :
X Toru ZPM Constituency
Papum Pare District and son of Taba Gomb resident of Mepsoro Toru Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
14:Techi Serbang
Age: 0
Occupation :
VII Sagalee ZPM Constituency
Papum Pare District and son of Techi Taram resident of Pang Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
15:Taba Bishnu
Age: 0
Occupation :
Mandal President 16th Sagalee BJP Unit
Resident of Village Rachi Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Puto Bui, Tashap Nima Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Goyi Taba Raju,Kangge Taggu,Tonni Gammi,Amy Talom,Tanur Gao,Tsering Gyatso,Adam Tatak,Likha Tabin,T Taluk,Taba Tagum,R koyu BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17-08-2026
None appears for the petitioners. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, and Mr. R. Koyu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4 to 15, are present. The present writ petition pertains to the rejection of a complaint filed by petitioner No. 2 seeking disqualification of nine Zilla Parishad Members (ZPMs), who were elected in the Panchayat election held in the year 2020. The subsequent Panchayat election has already been conducted in the year 2025. In view of the subsequent election and the fact that the term of the ZPMs elected in the year 2020 has already come to an end, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant