Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/297/2023 of Langda Yapek and 5 Ors. Vs the Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ors. on 16 August 2026
GAHC040008692023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/297/2023 Langda Yapek and 5 Ors. W/o Shri Langda Tassar, Resident of Lapang Ato Colony, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. M. No.
GAHC040008692023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/297/2023
Langda Yapek and 5 Ors.
W/o Shri Langda Tassar,
Resident of Lapang Ato Colony, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
M. No. 7641916781 2: Charu Yakap
Age:
Occupation :
W/o Shri Charu Ganiya
R/o G Sector
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
AP
3: Gora Yaro
Age:
Occupation :
W/o Lt. Gora Tacho
R/o Ganga
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
AP
4: Byabang Kampu
Age:
Occupation :
W/o Shri Byabang Lotak
R/o D Sector Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5: Tulam Yaji
Age:
Occupation :
W/o Shri Byabang Lotak
R/o D Sector Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6: Dare Yama
Age:
Occupation :
W/o Shri Dare Tapang
R/o Donyi Polo Colony Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
the Deputy Commissioner and 4 Ors.
Itanagar Capital Complex, District Papum Pare, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
2:the
Estate Officer cum ADC
Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Capital Complex
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Dr. Biman Natung
Age: 0
Occupation :
Resident of Ganga Market
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Taro Tagio
Age: 0
Occupation :
Resident of Ganga Market
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Tok Tama
Age: 0
Occupation :
Resident of Ganga Market
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Chorpok Modi,A Saring,N Rama,N Kanu,P Tatam,T
Rahul,N Kuma,Bomyom Ori
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.08.2026 Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant