Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/57/2026 of Ms Mumtak Lego Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 13 August 2026
GAHC040002062026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/57/2026 Ms Mumtak Lego Daughter of Late Payon Lego, resident of Agam Colony, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040002062026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/57/2026
Ms Mumtak Lego
Daughter of Late Payon Lego, resident of Agam Colony, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, State of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111
2:The Secretary Land Management
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar 791111
3:The Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Land Management
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar 791111
4:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Office of the Deputy Commissioner
Est Siang District
PO Pasihgat
Arunachal Pradesh 791102
5:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
Pasighat
Page No.# 2/2
PO Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh. 791102
6:The Estate Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Pasighat
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh. 79110
Advocate for the Petitioner : Niranjan Sarma, Abanso Gamre Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. Gamre, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. Mr. Gamre, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the notification issued by the Government in connection with the claim of the petitioner, he has been instructed not to pressed with the matter any further and, accordingly, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the same, to which Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate, has raised no objection. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
Sabnam Mepo (SPA)