Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/346/2026 of Nabam Komal Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 12 August 2026
GAHC040013222026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/346/2026 Nabam Komal Age: 41 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Nabam Tagung permanent resident of Rupung Village Sangdupota Circe PO and PS Balijan Papum Pare
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040013222026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/346/2026
Nabam Komal
Age: 41 Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Nabam Tagung
permanent resident of Rupung Village
Sangdupota Circe PO and PS Balijan
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Upper Niti Vihar PO Itanagar PS Niti Vihar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP represented by the Secretary General Administration Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
2:The Deputy Commissioner
Address:Itanagar Capital Complex
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Executive Engineer (UD)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Department of Urban Affairs
Itanagar Division
Itanagar.
4:The Assistant Commissioner cum Estate Officer Address:Itanagar Capital Complex Itanagar.
------------
Advocate for : Adam Tatak
Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 3 Ors: Advocate ,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.08.2026
Heard Mr. Tukrin Ligu, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Pura Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. In view of the order passed by this Court today in the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)182(AP)2026, no further order is called for in this writ petition and the writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant