Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/280/2024 of Ramu Welly Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 10 August 2026
GAHC040008962024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/280/2024 Ramu Welly Son of Shri Nobo Welly, Dipik Village, PO and PS Seijosa, District Pakke Kessang, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008962024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/280/2024
Ramu Welly Son of Shri Nobo Welly, Dipik Village, PO and PS Seijosa, District Pakke Kessang, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Commissioner/ Secretary, UD and Housing, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0
Occupation :
Coordination
Training and vigilance
PWD
Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
3:The Chief Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
UD and Housing
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
4:Taban Tabing
Age: 0
Occupation :
Executive Engineer
Department of UD and Housing
Boleng Division
Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
Boleng
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Sr. Adv, Kirmani Lollen,Y Mugli,Terji Kamchi,Khoda Apa,Taba Tokur,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), T Tagam,Signal Yirang,T Gamlin,Tabung Nonang,A
Perme,Wintet Sawin,Krishna Dubey,Lissing Perme BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 11.08.2026
Ms. Y. Mugli, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, prays for allowing her to withdraw this writ petition.
2. Prayer not being objected to by Ms. T. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, and Mr. Lissing Perme, learned counsel for the private respondent No. 4, is accepted.
3. The instant writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant