Gauhati High Court

IA(Crl)/79/2026 of Deepak Khatri Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040012712026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/79/2026 Deepak Khatri Son of Shri Dil Bahadur Khatri, a permanent resident of Q-33/ A , PO and PS Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, Delhi VERSUS The State of AP and

GAHC040012712026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(Crl)/79/2026

Deepak Khatri

Son of Shri Dil Bahadur Khatri,

a permanent resident of Q-33/A,

PO and PS Mohan Garden,

Uttam Nagar,

Delhi

VERSUS

The State of AP and 5 Ors

represented by the PP of AP

2:Smti Nabam Sonu Tok

Age: 0

Occupation :

Daughter of Late Nabam Mab

a resident of Pachin Colony

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

3:Tana Bapu

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Shri Tana Taya

a resident of Village Nirjuly II (b)

PO and PS Nirjuli

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

4:Smti Techi Yasuk

Age: 0

Occupation :

Wife of Shri Techi joseph

a resident of Lekhi village

PO and PS Doimukh

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

5:Smti Yasam Basar

Age: 0

Occupation :

Wife of J P Das

a resident of Press Colony Naharlagun

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

6:John Techi Tara

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Late Mangying Techi

a resident of Korjuri Colony Naharlagun

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh

Advocate for the Petitioner : Pramod Kr. Gour, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Linked Case : Crl.Petn./1/2026

Deepak Khatri

Age: 40

Occupation :

Address:Son of Shri Dil Bahadur Khatri

a permanent resident of Q-33/A

PO and PS Mohan Garden

Uttam Nagar

Delhi

VERSUS

The State of AP and 5 Ors

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:represented by the PP of AP

2:Smti Nabam Sonu Tok

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Daughter of Late Nabam Mab

a resident of Pachin Colony

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

3:Tana Bapu

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Son of Shri Tana Taya

a resident of Village Nirjuly II (b)

PO and PS Nirjuli

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

4:Smti Techi Yasuk

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Wife of Shri Techi joseph

a resident of Lekhi village

PO and PS Doimukh

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

5:Smti Yasam Basar

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Wife of J P Das

a resident of Press Colony Naharlagun

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

6:John Techi Tara

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Son of Late Mangying Techi

a resident of Korjuri Colony Naharlagun

PO and PS Naharlagun

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh.

------------

Advocate for : Pramod Kr. Gour

Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP and 5 Ors: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 07-08-2026 Heard Mr. P. K. Gour, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner and Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The present interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner seeking amendment of the cause title of Crl. Petn. No. 1/2026. It is stated in Paragraph 2 of the interlocutory application that when the applicant/petitioner initially filed the criminal petition, the relief sought was for quashing of the FIR registered as Naharlagun P.S. Case No. 119/2025. However, during the pendency of the main petition, a charge-sheet was submitted on 16.01.2026. In the circumstances, the present prayer for amendment of the petition has been made.

3. The proposed amendments are indicated in Paragraph No. 4 and 5 of the interlocutory application.

4. The prayer for amendment is allowed.

5. The petitioner shall file an amended petition incorporating the details pursuant to the submission of the charge-sheet, including the consequential amendment of the prayer and memo of parties.

6. A copy of the amended petition shall be furnished to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

7. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead