Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/78/2026 of Govind Arangham Vs The State of AP and Anr on 6 August 2026
GAHC040012592026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/63/2026 Ms Goi Doke Age: 34 Occupation : Address:Daughter of Late Gego Doke C/o Smti Gojum Mahi Nyodu Papu Hill P.O Naharlagun and P.S Papu Hill Papum Pare
GAHC040012592026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/63/2026
Ms Goi Doke
Age: 34
Occupation :
Address:Daughter of Late Gego Doke
C/o Smti Gojum Mahi Nyodu
Papu Hill
P.O Naharlagun and P.S Papu Hill
Papum Pare District
Arunachal
Pradesh.
VERSUS
Govind Arangham and Anr
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Son of Sri Rawpong Arangham
resident of Mowb II
Itanagar
P.O Itanagar and P.S Mowb II
Papum pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:represented by the PP of AP
------------
Advocate for : Rage Koyu
Advocate for : Rajesh Sonar appearing for Govind Arangham and Anr: Advocate , appearing for 2, respectively.
Linked Case : Crl.Petn./188/2023
Govind Arangham
Age: 40
Occupation :
Address:son of Sri Rawpong Arangham
resident of Mowb II
Itanagar
P.O Itanagar and P.S Mowb II
Papum pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Mobile No. 8974829077
VERSUS
The State of AP and Anr.
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Represented by the Public Prosecutor.
2:Miss Goi Doke
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Daughter of Late Gego Doke
C/o Smti Gojum Mahi Nyodu
Papu Hill
P.O Naharlagun and P.S Papu Hill
Papum Pare District
Arunachal
Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for :
Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP and Anr.: Advocate , appearing for 2, respectively.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 07-08-2026 Heard Mr. R. Koyu, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. M. Khambo, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
2. In the main petition, i.e., Crl. Petn. No. 188/2023, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 04.09.2024, was pleased to stay the further proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1/2024 pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Yupia. The interim order was initially passed till the returnable date and has, thereafter, been extended from time to time.
3. The applicant, who is respondent No. 2 in the connected criminal petition and the informant of the case, submits that he is being prejudiced by the stay of the proceedings in Sessions Case No. 1/2024 and has, therefore, filed the present interlocutory application seeking vacation of the aforesaid order of stay dated 04.09.2024.
4. The scanned copy of the Trial Court Record has already been received.
5. Learned counsel appearing for both sides have mutually agreed that they would seek disposal of the main petition, which is stated to be already fixed for hearing on 12.08.2026.
6. Accordingly, this interlocutory application may also be tagged with Crl. Petn. No. 188/2023 and posted for listed on 12.08.2026.
7. It is observed that, if for any reason the there is delay in disposing of the main criminal petition, the applicant shall be at liberty to agitate his prayer for vacation of the stay made in this application.
8. Interim order passed earlier on 04.09.2024, in Crl.Petn./188/2023, shall continue till the next date of listing. JUDGE Comparing Assistant CHECKED & VERIFIED Digitally signed by Jumbi Bam Date: 2026.08.07 18:21:24 +05'30'