Gauhati High Court
AB/71/2026 of Mingo Lollen Vs The State AP on 29 July 2026
GAHC040009182026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/68/2026 Goli Lollen Son of Shri Mingo Lollen, resident of Khoto Village Lekhi, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently posted at
GAHC040009182026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : AB/68/2026
Goli Lollen
Son of Shri Mingo Lollen, resident of Khoto Village Lekhi, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently posted at Tangla, PO and PS
Tangla, Udalguri, Assam.
VERSUS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Arun Yun,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D Ado
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
with Case No. : AB/69/2026
Miss Nyasum Lollen
Daughter of Shri Mingo Lollen, a permanent resident of Kombo Tarsu Mobuk Village, PO and SP Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Khoto Village Lekhi, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Arun Yun,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D
Ado
With Case No. : AB/70/2026
Miss Gopi Lollen
Daughter of Shri Mingo Lollen, a permanent resident of Kombo Tarsu Mobuk Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at Little Star Girl PG, Pappu Nallah, PO and PS Pappu Hills, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Arun Yun,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D
Ado
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
with Case No. : AB/71/2026
Mingo Lollen
Son of Late Damin Lollen, a permanent resident of Kombo Tarsu Mobuk Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State AP
represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kemo Lollen, Tojum Tao,Arun Yun,Maryum Sora,Geli Taye,D Ado
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date :30-07-2026 Heard Mr. K. Lollen, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional PP for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
2. This is an application filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking grant of pre-arrest bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Itanagar Women P.S. Case No. 48/2026 registered under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The case of the petitioners is that based on a written First Information Report(FIR) lodged on 26.05.2026 before the Officer-in-Charge, Itanagar Women Police Station, alleging, inter alia, that the petitioners have subjected the complainant to physical assault, mental cruelty and domestic violence, the aforesaid police case has been registered against them. The petitioner in AB/68/2026 is the husband and the petitioners in the other three anticipatory bail applications are his family members.
4. The petitioners were granted interim bail on 22.06.2026 with conditions and CD was called for.
5. In this context, Mr. T. Ete, learned Addl. PP submits that in the meantime, the investigation has been completed and has resulted in a chargesheet vide CS No. 58/2026 under section 85 BNS. The communication received from the the IO may be kept on record.
6. It may be mentioned herein that Section 85 corresponds to earlier section 498 (A). In view of completion of investigation, I am of the considered view that the interim bail can be confirmed.
7. In such view of the matter, interim bail is hereby made absolute subject to the further conditions that:-
(i) They shall be available for trial, if one commences;
(ii) They shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence;
(iii) They shall not intimidate, harm or harass the alleged victim in any manner whatsoever.
8. The anticipatory bail applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant