Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/348/2025 of Gem Dopum Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 29 July 2026
GAHC040012832025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/348/2025 Gem Dopum Son of Late Gem Teri, resident of Village Talo, PO Yachuli, PS Yazali, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 3
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040012832025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/348/2025
Gem Dopum
Son of Late Gem Teri, resident of Village Talo, PO Yachuli, PS Yazali, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary cum Chief Vigilance Officer, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, AP Civil Secretariat, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Public Work Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
AP Civil Secretariat
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Deputy Secretary Vigilance
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:The Superintendent of Police
Age: 0
Occupation :
Special Investigation Cell now redesignated as SP Anti Corruption Bureau AP Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : Gimi Tarak, Byabang Mema Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (SIC),Ojing Pada BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-07-2026
Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. G. Tarak, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General, is present. In view of the submission made, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant