Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/195/2024 of Smti Wiram Matey Vs The Deputy Commissioner and 5 Ors on 23 July 2026
GAHC040006352024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/195/2024 Smti Wiram Matey Wife of Shri P Matey, a resident of Old Paniduria Village, PO and PS Borduria, Tirap District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The Deputy
GAHC040006352024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/195/2024
Smti Wiram Matey
Wife of Shri P Matey, a resident of Old Paniduria Village, PO and PS Borduria, Tirap District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The Deputy Commissioner and 5 Ors
Tirap District, Khonsa, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Ira Singhal IAS
Age: 0
Occupation :
Office of the Deputy Commissioner
Tirap District
Khonsa
Arunachal Pradesh
3:The Member Secretary
Age: 0
Occupation :
Zilla Parishad Tirap Panchayat Department Khonsa Tirap District Arunachal Pradesh 4:Ms Chatong Lowang ZPC Tirap Age: 0
Occupation :
Daughter of W Lowang
a resident of Tutnu Village
PO Tutnu
PS Lazu
Tirap District
Arunachal Pradesh
5:Tediap Hallang
ZPM Bari Basip
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late P Hallang
a resident of Lamsa Village
PO Khela
PS Khonsa
Tirap District
Arunachal Pradesh
6:Ms Sarah Wanglat
ZPM Borduria
Age: 0
Occupation :
Daughter of L Wanglat
a resident of Boruria Village
PO and PS Borduria
Tirap District
Arunachal Prades
Advocate for the Petitioner : C W Mantaw, 2 J Singpho,M Gogoi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), R Basar,Subu Tapin,Rinchin Ledo Thungon BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-07-2026
It is submitted at the Bar that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate for the State respondent Nos. 1 & 3 and Mr. T. Wangdak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 6, are present.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant