Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/561/2025 of Prem Khandu Jebisow and Anr Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 23 July 2026
GAHC040019732025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/561/2025 Prem Khandu Jebisow and Anr Son of Shri K Khandu Jebisow, resident of Bhalukpong, PO and PS Bhalukpong, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:
GAHC040019732025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/561/2025
Prem Khandu Jebisow and Anr
Son of Shri K Khandu Jebisow, resident of Bhalukpong, PO and PS Bhalukpong, West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Smti Gichum Sangro
Age:
Occupation :
Wife of Prem Khandu Jebisow
PO and PS Bhalukpong
West Kameng District
Arunachal Prades
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Secretary Land Management
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Bomdila
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Additional Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Rupa
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
Bomdila
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The Divisionla Forest Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Bomdila
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
7:The General Manager
Age: 0
Occupation :
Power Grid
Seppa
Comp
Scheme
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Bomnya Kamdak, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-07-2026
Mr. T. Roleng, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. Y. Riram, learned Government Advocate, is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant