Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/200/2023 of Meyi Karga Vs THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. on 23 July 2026
GAHC040005332023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/200/2023 Meyi Karga D/o Late Tame Karga, Permanent Residence of Village Kamki, PO/PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, Presently residing at
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005332023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/200/2023
Meyi Karga
D/o Late Tame Karga,
Permanent Residence of Village Kamki, PO/PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, Presently residing at Arunachal Bhawan, New Delhi
VERSUS
THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors.
Represented by the Secretary, Department of Land Management, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chief Estate Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Capital Complex
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Capital Complex
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:Extra Assistant Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Capital Complex
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
Advocate for the Petitioner : Gumto Kato, Gamken Bam,Nyado Karga,Kirmani Lollen,Terji Page No.# 2/2
Kamchi
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Elina Perme,Duge Soki BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-07-2026 Mr. G. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition in view of the fact that there is an appeal provision under Section 83 of the Arunachal Pradesh (Land Settlement and Records) Act, 2000, whereby an appeal shall lie before the Government, represented by the concerned Secretary, against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner. Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant