Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/19/2024 of M/S Capital Enterprises Vs The State of AP and 8 Ors on 21 July 2026
GAHC040000582024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/19/2024 M/S Capital Enterprises C Sector Barapani Bazar, Naharlagun, represented by its sole proprietor Smti Senbom Taipodia, D/o Mahan Taipodia, Capital Home
GAHC040000582024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/19/2024
M/S Capital Enterprises
C Sector Barapani Bazar, Naharlagun, represented by its sole proprietor Smti Senbom Taipodia, D/o Mahan Taipodia, Capital Home Complex, C Sector, Naharlagun, Papumpare District, AP
VERSUS
The State of AP and 8 Ors
represented by the Secretary, RWD, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Secretary Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD cum Empowered Officer
Arunachal Rural Road Development Agency (ARRDA)
Itanagar
3:The Chief Engineer (PMGSY)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Department of RWD
Govt of AP
Itanagar
4:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Namsai Circle
Department of RWD
Govt of AP
5:The Execcutive Engineer/ PIU
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Likabali Division
Lower Siang District
Govt of AP
6:The Executive Engineer/ PIU
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Tezu Division
Namsai District
Govt of AP
7:Tender Evaluation Committee
Age: 0
Occupation :
Construction of Full Depth reclamation (FDR) works under RWD Namsai and Pasighat Circle under the scheme of PMGSY
headed by its Chairman
Superintending Engineer
Rural Works Circle
Namsai
8:M/s Sedi Alllied Agency
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Dr. Samson Borang resident of Tigra Mirbuk Village Pasighat PO Pasighat East Siang District AP
9:M/S N T Agency
Age: 0
Occupation :
having its head office at B Sector Naharlagun PO Naharlagun Papumpare District represented by its sole proprietor Shri Nabam Tadap S/o Late Nabam Lilung resident of Paga Tara (Julang Village) PO Naharlagun Papumpare District AP 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Tagum, Likha Tabin,R koyu
Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC(RWD)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.07.2026 Heard Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel for the RWD, has placed on record the current status of the FDR projects involved in the present writ petition, namely, two projects under the Tezu Division and one project under the Likabali Division. A perusal of the current status of the projects reflects that the works of the two projects under the Tezu Division have been completed on 03.12.2025, while the project under the Likabali Division has been completed up to 85%. In view of the above, and as fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. The copies of the current status reports of the FDR projects under the Tezu and Likabali Divisions are taken on record and marked as document 'X' for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant