Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/133/2026 of Nyamar Karbak Vs Pesi Jilen on 1 July 2026
GAHC040008682024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/133/2026 Nyamar Karbak Age: 43 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tumnya Karbak resident of Dego Kamki village PO and PS Kamba West Siang District Arunachal
GAHC040008682024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/133/2026
Nyamar Karbak
Age: 43
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Tumnya Karbak
resident of Dego Kamki village
PO and PS Kamba
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Pesi Jilen
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Gepe Jilen
resident of Ese Kerte Village
PO and PS Liromoba
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
------------
Advocate for : Jumge Karbak
Advocate for : Romjir Rakshap appearing for Pesi Jilen: Advocate appearing for respectively.
Linked Case :Election Pet./6/2024
Nyamar Karbak
Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Pesi Jilen
Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, Nyali Sora,M Tanga,Jumge Karbak,KeekeLoya Advocate for the Respondent : Romjir Rakshap, Takom Roleng,Bomnya Kamdak BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02.07.2026
Heard Mr. Marto Kato, learned counsel for the applicant/election petitioner. Also heard Mr. Romjir Rakshap, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/returned candidate.
2. By way of filing this application, the applicant/election petitioner has prayed for adjournment of the hearing of the connected election petition being E.P. 06(AP)2024 for framing of issues and filing of documents in the said election petition.
3. The above prayer, has not been objected to by Mr. Rakshap, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/returned candidate.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the prayer made by the applicant/election petitioner, the hearing of the election petition i.e. E.P. 06(AP)2024, stands adjourned, to be listed again on 23rd July, 2026.
5. With the above, the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant