Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/130/2026 of Pesi Jilen Vs Nyamar Karbak on 1 July 2026
GAHC040008682024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/130/2026 Pesi Jilen Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Gepe Jilen resident of Ese Kerte Village PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh
GAHC040008682024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/130/2026
Pesi Jilen
Age: 55
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Gepe Jilen
resident of Ese Kerte Village
PO and PS Liromoba
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Nyamar Karbak
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Son of Late Tumnya Karbak
resident of Dego Kamki village
PO and PS Kamba
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
------------
Advocate for : Romjir Rakshap
Advocate for : Marto Kato appearing for Nyamar Karbak: Advocate appearing for respectively.
Linked Case :Election Pet./6/2024
Nyamar Karbak
Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Pesi Jilen
Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, Nyali Sora,M Tanga,Jumge Karbak,KeekeLoya Advocate for the Respondent : Romjir Rakshap, Takom Roleng,Bomnya Kamdak BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02.07.2026
Heard Mr. Romjir Rakshap, learned counsel for the applicant/ returned candidate. Also heard Mr. Marto Kato, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/election petitioner.
2. The present application has been filed under Order VI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking amendment of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025.
3. The applicant/returned candidate has now specifically set-out the amendment proposed to be carried-out in paragraph Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9; append 2(two) documents in paragraph Nos. 5 & 6; as well as the prayer portion of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025.
4. Mr. Kato, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/election petitioner, fairly submits that in view of the order passed by the Court today in the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)135(AP)2026, allowing the applicant/returned candidate to carry-out the proposed amendments, he has no objection if the proposed amendments, as noted-above, is allowed.
5. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
6. The applicant/returned candidate is permitted to carry-out the amendments, more particularly, the paragraph Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9; appending 2(two) documents in paragraph Nos. 5 & 6; as well as amending the prayer portion of the connected interlocutory application being IA(c)155(AP)2025, in terms of the amended application; within a period of 1(one) week from today. The amended IA(c)155(AP)2025, shall form a part of the record.
7. With the above, the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant