Gauhati High Court

PIL/7/2025 of Sangha Tanang Vs The State of AP and 16 Ors on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040002752025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/7/2025 Sangha Tanang Son of Late Sangha Tasuk, Village Mengio, PO Parsi Parlo, PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP

GAHC040002752025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : PIL/7/2025

Sangha Tanang

Son of Late Sangha Tasuk, Village Mengio, PO Parsi Parlo, PS Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

The State of AP and 16 Ors

represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary Age: 0

Occupation :

Rural Development

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

3:The Secretary

Age: 0

Occupation :

Planning

Finance and Investment Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

4:The Deputy Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh.

5:The Director

Age: 0

Occupation :

Rural Development Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

6:The Joint Director

Age: 0

Occupation :

Rural Development Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

7:The Project Director

Age: 0

Occupation :

Rural Development Department

Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh.

8:The Block Development Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

CD Block Parsi Parlo

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh.

9:The Circle Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

CD Block Parsi Parlo

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh.

10:Gichik Tami

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Late Gichik Takar

proprietor of M/s G T Enterprise

Village Pado

PO and PS Parsi Parlo

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

11:Dongche Peter

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Shri Dongche Taning

proprietor of M/s Sera Agency

Village Nyokum

PO and PS Itanagar

Papum Pare District

Arunachal Pradesh 791113

12:Bake Tama

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Shri Bake Talit

proprietor of M/s B M Enterprise

Village Rashik

PO Parsi Parlo

PS Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

13:Smti Rido Rina

Age: 0

Occupation :

Wife of Shri Nangram Mire

near Craft Centre Koloriang

proprietor of M/s Harang Enterprise

Village Sera

PO and PS Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

14:Lokam Takuk

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Lokam Tari

proprietor of M/s L T Enterprise

Village Maruk

PO Damin

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

15:Lokam Tamar

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Shri Lokam Tachung

proprietor of M/s L T Enterprise

Village Lubupa

PO Damin

PS Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

16:Bamang Pacho

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Shri Bamang Tabang

proprietor of M/s Pacho Enterprise

Village Langbang

PO and PS Parsi Parlo

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 791118

17:Dongche Hapum

Age: 0

Occupation :

Son of Late Dongche Nigla

proprietor of M/s D H Enterprise

Village Sera

PO Parsi Parlo

PS Koloriang

Kurung Kumey District

Arunachal Pradesh 79111

Advocate for the Petitioner : Michi Nibo, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Nannu Yubi,Tachung Nalo,Biri Esther,Tadar Bai,Wanglat Khomrang,E S NIDO MARI,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,K Gara,Uttam Deka,Chorpok Modi,SC

(RD),Binter Picha

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 02.07.2026 (K. Ete, J.)

Heard Mr. M. Nibo, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms P. Pangu, learned State counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 9, Mr. B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel, Rural Development Department for the respondent Nos.2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.11 to 17.

2. The petitioner who is a local inhabitant of Mangio village and a Gram Panchayat Chairperson of Sangha segment under CD-Block Parsi Parlo, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh has filed this petition in the form of Public Interest Litigation alleging corruption and to save the public property and public money in the interest of entire people of CD-Block Parsi Parlo, Kurung Kumey District with the following prayers:-

1. To direct the respondent authority to issue an order for immediate stoppage of construction activities of community halls at CD-Block lock Parsi Parlo District: Kurung Kumey, Arunachal Pradesh, in NIT No. BDO/PP/NIT/VVP/2023-24, Dated: 25/06/2024.

2. For Direction to the respondent No.3, the Secretary Planning, Finance & Investment Department, (A.P) not to release bill against the said construction works of Community Halls at CD-Block Parsi Parlo, Kurung Kumey District, in NIT No. BDO/PP/NIT/VVP/2023-24, Dated: 25/06/2024, without proper enquiry reports of executed works.

3. Direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Koloriang, Kurung Kumey District, (A.P) report to submit the report immediately as sought by the Secretary, Planning, finance and Investment Department and to pass necessary stoppage order in construction of community halls in NIT No. BDO/PP/NIT/VVP/2023-24, Dated: 25/06/2024.

4. To setup an independent enquiry committee regarding the allegation made in the instant PIL in connection with the construction of community halls at CD-Block Parsi Parlo, in NIT BDO/PP/NIT/VVP2023-2024 Dated: 25/06/2024, with the direction for registering a case against the person who are involved in the said

3. Vide NIT dated 25.06.2024, the Joint Director (RE), Rural Development Department, Itanagar has invited bids from the eligible contractors for construction of 12 Units of Community hall under CD-Block Parsi Parlo amounting to Rs.11,82,00000/-(Rupees Eleven Crore Eighty Two Lakh)only from the registered contractors of Class-III and IV categories domiciled within the territorial jurisdiction of Assembly Constituency CD-Block Parsi Parlo as per the Arunachal Pradesh District Based Entrepreneurs and Professionals (Development and Promotion) Act, 2015. The estimated costs of 12 Community halls at different places were Rs. 98,50,000/-(Rupees Ninety Eight Thousand Fifty Thousand) each.

4. Mr. M. Nibo, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that constructions of the above 12 Unit of Community halls are of sub-standard quality and the constructions have not been carried out as per Detail Project report (DPR). He submits that respondent authorities in connivance with the contractors have replaced the official geo tagging and unofficially geo tagged the site without Land Availability Certificate, Non- Duplicity Certificate and Non- Encumbrance Certificate, as well as shifted the sites to a far off distance altogether against the original geo tagged. He submits that the nature of construction of community halls have been carried out violating the original Detail Project report by reducing a half of plinth area of community hall. Therefore, construction is of sub-standard and not in accordance with the DPR which would be wastage of public fund and public interest as the sub-standard construction of the community halls would collapse at any moment.

5. Mr. B. Picha, learned Standing Counsel for the Rural Development

Department/respondent Nos2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 while referring to the verification report dated 07.03.2025, submits that on the complaint, the Deputy Commissioner has constituted a committee to undertake a ground verification of the allegations as regards discrepancies in implementation of 12 Community Halls under Vibrant Village Programme in Parsi Parlo CD Block for the year 2023-2024. Accordingly, committee consisting of 3(three) members carried out the site verification of construction of 12 Community halls. He submits that the verification report clearly reflects that all the ongoing works found shifted to a few distance from its original geo tagged location which should have been avoided however, due to its harsh terrain, land donation issues and keeping in view for better accessibility and greater utility by the users concern, such shifting of the area to a negligible distance from old geo tagged sites has to be made. The construction of the 12 Community halls having been completed as per the DPR, there is no cause of worry, nor there is any misappropriation of fund for construction of the said community halls, except shifting to negligible few distances from the old site.

6. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the materials available on record.

7. The case projected in this PIL by the petitioner is that fund amounting to Rs.11,82,00000/-(Rupees Eleven Crore Eighty Two Lakh) only was sanctioned on 25.06.2024 for construction of 12 Community halls under CD Block Parsi Parlo in the District of Kurung Kumey at the cost of Rs. 98,50,000/-(Rupees Ninety Eight Thousand Fifty Thousand) per unit. The constructions have been done without geo tagging and carried out allegedly without any Land Availability Certificate, Non-Duplicity Certificate and Non- Encumbrance Certificate. It is alleged that the community halls were construction far away from the original site. The petitioner has also contended that the representation dated 14.01.2025 was submitted before the Secretary Rural Development and Secretary Planning, Finance & investment Department, however, no action has been initiated.

8. Upon consideration, we noticed that the Deputy Commissioner, Kurung Kumey District vide an order dated 10.02.2025 has constituted 3(three) member committee to undertake a ground verification of the alleged complaints/discrepancies in implementation of the 13 VVP projects in Parsi Parlo CD Block for financial year 2023-2024. Pursuant thereto, the committee has undertaken the verification of implementation of the 12 Community halls under Vibrant Village Programmes in Parsi Parlo CD Block on 19.02.2025. The said verification report was submitted on 07.03.2025 by the Chairman of the said verification committee.

9. Perusal of the said verification report clearly reflects that there was negligible shifting of about 10 to 15 metres, 400 to 500 metres and 1 to 2 km from the earlier geo tagged locations. Such shifting of the sites for construction of the 12 Community halls is based on the Minutes of meeting held on 04.12.2024 in the presence of the representatives or members of the Panchayati Raj Institution and general public. The committee has made a general observation that ongoing works was found to be shifted to a few distance from its original geo tagged locations which should have been avoided however, due to its harsh geographical terrain, land donation issues and keeping in view for better accessibility and prospect of greater utility by the users concern, same would have been necessitated.

10. Having considered the submissions of the parties and also considering the site verification report which was undertaken by the committee constituted to verify the allegations in respect of the implementation of construction of 12 Community halls, we are of the considered view that no public injury appears to have been caused for which any direction is warranted, in view of the fact that although the site for construction of 12 Community halls has been shifted to a few distance from its original geo tagged locations, the same appears to have been necessitated due to its harsh geographical terrain, land donation issues and keeping in view for better accessibility and prospect of greater utility that too pursuant to the meeting held by the representatives or members of the Panchayati Raj Institution and other general public. The mere shifting of the construction site to few distances from its original geo tagged location cannot be said to have been made against the public interest rather such shifting appears to have been necessitated because of the geographical terrain, land donation issues etc., which would rather be in the interest of public.

11. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that no public injury is caused by the construction of 12 Community halls under CD Block Parsi Parlo, Kurung Kumey District at sites shifted to a few distance from its original geo tagged locations nor any misappropriation of fund is discernible. Accordingly, the present PIL stands dismissed, being devoid of merit.

JUDGE JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead