Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/153/2024 of M/s Khenewa Group Vs The State of AP and 4 Ors on 1 July 2026
GAHC040004452024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/153/2024 M/s Khenewa Group having its office at Waii Complex, Abotani Colony, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791110 represented by its proprietor Shri Rumak
GAHC040004452024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/153/2024
M/s Khenewa Group
having its office at Waii Complex, Abotani Colony, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791110 represented by its proprietor Shri Rumak Jomoh, Son of Shri Sam Jomoh, near Rajdhani Petrol Pump, A Sector, Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh, PO and PS Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 4 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar 2:The Director Age: 0
Occupation :
Women and Child Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
3:The Joint Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Women and Child Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
4:The Chairperson
Age: 0
Occupation :
Tender Selection Committee
C/o Director
Women and Child Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
5:M/s F B Enterprises
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Shri Khya Fangcha C Sector Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Hage Lampu, Joram Sanjay,Khyoda Moses Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Eho Menjo,Minter Karbak,Pritam Taffo BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02.07.2026 Heard Mr. K. Moses, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Pangu, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, and Ms. M. Karbak, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the decision of the Tender Selection Committee dated 29.02.2024, recommending M/s F. B. Enterprises, respondent No. 5 herein, for supply of “Pre School Kits” pursuant to the NIT dated 15.01.2024, issued by the Secretary, Women & Child Development Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, as well as the consequential award of the work in favour of respondent No. 5 vide letter dated 13.03.2024. It is submitted at the Bar that the work for supply of the Pre School Kits pursuant to the aforesaid NIT has already been executed and was completed on 03.09.2024. In view of above, the writ petition has become infructuous. However, if the petitioner claims to have suffered any loss or damage on account of the impugned action may approach the competent Civil Court that may be permissible under the law. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised, as may be permissible under the law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant