Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/135/2026 of Pesi Jilen Vs Nyamar Karbak on 1 July 2026
GAHC040010022026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/135/2026 Pesi Jilen Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Nyamar Karbak Son
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040010022026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/135/2026
Pesi Jilen
Son of Late Gepe Jilen, resident of Ese Kerte Village, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Nyamar Karbak
Son of Late Tumnya Karbak, resident of Dego Kamki village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Romjir Rakshap, Advocate for the Respondent : Jumge Karbak, -BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.07.2026
Heard Mr. R. Rakshap, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel for the opposite party/ Election petitioner.
2. By filing this application under Order VI Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the applicant is seeking some amendments and also for amending Page No.# 2/2 the prayer portion of I.A. 130 (AP) 2026.
3. The applicant has specifically set out the amendment proposed to be carried out in Paragraphs No. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 as well as the prayer portion of I.A. No. 130 (AP) 2026.
4. On the other hand, Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel for the opposite party/ Election petitioner has stated that there is objection to the proposed amendments.
5. In view of the above, as no prejudice is likely to be caused to the opposite party, this Court finds it proper to allow the application.
6. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to carry out the amendment in I.A. (C) 130 (AP) 2026 in terms of the amended application. The amended application shall form part of the record.
7. In terms of the above, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE CHECKED & VERIFIED Digitally signed by Talom Tali Date: 2026.07.02 19:56:11 +05'30'