Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/294/2026 of Taya Mra and 2 Ors Vs The Union of India and 4 Ors on 29 June 2026
GAHC040009902026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/294/2026 Taya Mra and 2 Ors Son of Late Takap Mra, resident of Limeking, PO and PS Nacho, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Tama Mra Age:
GAHC040009902026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/294/2026
Taya Mra and 2 Ors
Son of Late Takap Mra, resident of Limeking, PO and PS Nacho, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Tama Mra
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Tayo Mra
resident of Limeking
PO and PS Nacho
3: Tasi Mra
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Taniu Mra
resident of Limeking
PO and PS Nacho
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The Union of India and 4 Ors
represented by Inspector General North East Frontier HQ, ITB Police MHA, Govt of India, Khatting Hill, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111
2:The Deputy Commandant (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
SHQ Hollongi
ITBP Force
MHA/ Govt of India
Page No.# 2/3
Papum Pare District
3:The Deputy Commandant (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
NE FTR ITB Police
Itanagar.
4:The Commandant
Age: 0
Occupation :
10th Bn ITBP Kimin
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The Assistant Commissioner (Engr)
Age: 0
Occupation :
10th Bn ITB Police Limiking
Daporijo
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, K Gara,Sange Drema Philley,Nannu Yubi,Maji Dui,Tame Rimi,Bomyom Ori,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-06-2026
Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners, who fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate Civil Court. Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant