Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/296/2026 of Nabma Kaku and 2 Ors Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 29 June 2026
GAHC040009972026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/296/2026 Nabma Kaku and 2 Ors Son of Late Nabam Nagug, a resident of Village Inderjuli, PO and PS Balijan, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Nabam
GAHC040009972026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/296/2026
Nabma Kaku and 2 Ors
Son of Late Nabam Nagug, a resident of Village Inderjuli, PO and PS Balijan, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Nabam Hina
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Nabam Tade
a resident of Village Inderjuli
PO and PS Balijan
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3: Nabam Nyajung
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri nabam Tukia
a resident of Village Inderjuli
papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 3 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Law and justice, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 7911112:Gichik Lalin Age: 50
Occupation :
HGB
Presiding Customary Judge Apex Customary Court of Arunachal Pradesh upper Dobam Karsingsa PO and PS Banderdewa
Page No.# 2/3
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Tarh Tagio
Age: 48
Occupation :
Son of Late Tem Tacho
resident of Village Dulane
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Tarh James
Age: 35
Occupation :
Son of Shri Tarh Tagio
a resident of Dulane
PO and PS Mengio
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Nabam Rama, T Rahul,N Kuma,Teshi Aaku,Thaddeus Techi,Techi Ita Tara,P Tatam,N Kanu Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-06-2026
Mr. N. Rama, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Prayer is allowed. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty to file afresh.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant