Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/58/2026 of Gaithaolin Golmei Vs The State of AP on 25 June 2026
GAHC040009722026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/58/2026 Gaithaolin Golmei Son of Shri Thiujangpou Colmei, resident of Awangkhul Village, PO and PS Noney, District Noney, Manipur. VERSUS The State of AP
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040009722026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/58/2026
Gaithaolin Golmei
Son of Shri Thiujangpou Colmei, resident of Awangkhul Village, PO and PS Noney, District Noney, Manipur.
VERSUS
The State of AP
represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, -BEFORE- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
26.06.2026 Heard Mr. L. Kagum, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional PP for the State
2. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 80 days in preferring the connected appeal.
Page No.# 2/2
3. The grounds for delay in preferring the connected appeal has been elaborately explained in paragraphs Nos. 10 and 11 of the application.
4. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and on perusal of the grounds stated in the above-noted paragraphs; this Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected appeal. Moreover, the learned Addl. PP Mr. T. Ete has no objection condoning the delay, in question.
5. In view of the above; the delay of 80 (eighty) days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
6. The Interlocutory Application stands allowed and disposed of.
7. The Registry shall list the appeal for admission.
JUDGE Talom Tali, Private Secretary