Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/377/2025 of M/s Gemini Enterprise Vs The State of AP and 4 Ors on 25 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040013722025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/377/2025 M/s Gemini Enterprise represented by its proprietor Shri Binom Lego, resident of Village Bolung, PO and PS Roing, Lower Dibang Valley District,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040013722025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/377/2025

M/s Gemini Enterprise

represented by its proprietor Shri Binom Lego, resident of Village Bolung, PO and PS

Roing, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

The State of AP and 4 Ors

represented by the Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.

2:The Director

Age: 0

Occupation :

Department of Panchayat Raj

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

3:The Deputy Director

Age: 0

Occupation :

Department of Panchayat Raj

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

4:The District Panchayat Development Officer Age: 0

Occupation :

Roing

Lower Dibang Valley District

Arunachal Pradesh.

5:The Chairman

Age: 0

Page No.# 2/2

Occupation :

Tender Evaluation Committee (NIT No. Package No.LDV/PR/RGSA/2024-25

dated 09.07.2025) Department of Panchayat Raj Roing Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Tamo Taggu, Lardam Murtem,N Doji Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 26-06-2026 Mr. L. Murtem, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the matter has become infructuous. Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant CHECKED & VERIFIED Digitally signed by Jumbi Bam Date: 2026.06.26 15:13:57 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead